The High Wire Artist

I mentioned in a recent post about how I enjoy not knowing too much about what’s coming when I’m planning on watching a movie or starting in on a new book. I should add as a contradictory corollary, that I do have some favourite movies I will watch again and again – where I pretty much absolutely know what’s coming.

But in that post I mentioned that when it comes to writing blurbs for my own books, that I work hard to ensure that I don’t give too much away, but do write enough to entice readers.

The balancing act. I like how the high-wire walker in the photo here has still got safety cables attached. You wouldn’t get me up on one of those things, but sure as eggs I’m confident that the smartest of those people have safety cables carabinered on.

Here’s my practise a blurb for “Mech Variant”, a Wildest Skies story coming out later this year.


A brutal and challenging tale that pits common sense against survival instincts.

Galactic explorer Ed Linklater wants a quiet moment enjoying planet Gladioll’s sweet, restful scenery.

To bad the scenery lies in the firing line.

A high-stakes emotional roller coaster of a story that takes no prisoners.

 


Do I give too much away there? Not enough? Have I straddled the balance of revealing enough to make someone sufficiently intrigued to read the story, but not so over-informed that they won’t bother?

As with anything in writing, I’ll just keep learning and keep striving.

 

image: Adobe stock. Book cover image © Grandeluc | Dreamstime

 

In Praise of Not Knowing

Note -the IMDB pages about the movies I’m discussing contain details that would be considered spoilers, in the context of what I’m writing about here.

I think I’ve written before about how I too often find book blurbs and movie trailers too revealing. As in, containing plot spoilers. How often have you watched a trailer and felt like you’d seen the whole movie?

Now, I do know that the makers of these trailers are experts at pulling disparate parts of a movie together to create a kind of flow within the trailer that creates a different story that’s distinct, perhaps even distracting from the movies true story. Still.

Long ago I watched a movie called “The Girl With All The Gifts“, on the basis of seeing the title and the movie poster (which as I recall was different from the poster on IMDB). I had no idea that it was a particular kind of movie, and didn’t realise for quite some time way through the movie – because it was well-crafted and neatly told.

Had I watched the trailer and read the blurb, I think I would have enjoyed the film less (something backed up when I was at a writers’ convention and the title was mentioned-I hadn’t know it had orginated as a book-I said what a great movie it was, to receive some murmurs of disdain from some others who had clearly read the book and found the movie wanting).

Now recently I watched another movie that I enjoyed, titled “Hurry Up Tomorrow“, again on the basis of the poster – well, the Netflix title card which showed a woman standing in front of a burning house. That was enough for me. There’s a whole bunch of story in that single image. So I watched the movie.

It started out weird, but went along the kind of off-beat, arthouse trajectory of many movies I’ve enjoyed in the past. Just plain odd. Well-made, well-lit, surreal and, for the most part, engaging.

I did not know that the lead actor is a well-known singer, and the story follows a vaguely autobiographical arc, with many liberties. I knew of him, but didn’t really know his music or his story. Afterward, I followed up, and read some more. Now, this guy’s music is not really to my taste-I had a listen to the sountrack album and some other songs. That’s okay. I like the movie.

Then, still following up, I found out the movie bombed at the box office. That it was critically panned, as self-indulgent and essentially an extended video for his latest music.

I didn’t get that at all. I just enjoyed a weird movie with an odd structure. If I had know all that ahead of time, I suspect I would have enjoyed it less.

What would I know, though?

I guess I’m just coming at this saying that, however my brain works, I like not knowing too much ahead of time. At least when it comes to entertainment.


Oh, since I’m supposed to be using this blog as a promotion tool for my writing, I should mention that my Yearbook 2025 is out now, both in print and as an ebook. This is a lot of reading-130,000 words-for not too much coin-$9.99 electronic.

 

 

 

The First Annual Collection by Sean Monaghan

A treasure trove of great reads, filled with compelling, mind-bending fiction.

Includes the Full novel The Ingersal Ballet, the Award-Winning novelette “Daisy and Maisie, External Hull Maintenance Experts” and more, including “Sigrid’s Eagle”, “Caprock”, “Mangled Gravity”, “Peruser”, “Heading for Boise”, “Lying Cameras”, “The Quiet Hours”. And the never before published Morgenfeld story only available here, “The Diorama”.

With an introduction and an afterword by the author.


I think I’ll do a follow up post in the near future about working on my own blurbs so that they give away just enough of the story to get the reader intrigued, and not enough to put them off.

The High Wire Artist.

Thanks for reading.

Sean

 

Movie ticket image: Adobe stock

Writing sales copy – still learning

I like to think that I’m growing and learning as a writer (and despite a string of university qualifications, I’m starting to  wonder if I’m a slow learner. Perhaps a topic for another post). As I learn, I hope I’m getting better a writing blurbs. Blurbs are a whole other language (did I mention somewhere that I struggle with learning languages?).

Stories seem to fall out of me, yet blurbs are more like that old story about pulling teeth.

It strikes me that a blurb, as in sales copy, must describe the book, but not reveal the book. They must be punchy. Rather than saying, ‘well, you might enjoy this book’, they should say, in effect, ‘READ THIS NOW! Your life depends on it!’ I’ve been looking back over some of my blurbs and starting to get a sense of how they miss that. By a wide mark. Sometimes wide means something like the gulf between galaxies.Raven Rising thumb

My recent book Raven Rising started out with this goofy blurb:

“Practically swallowed up by alien forest, the wreck of the Raven offers few clues to the team eager to discover why the ship wrecked so violently. Crack investigator Angelie Gunnarson faces an enormous task. Will she be able to find the answers before time runs out? An action-packed short sci-fi novel from the award-winning
author of The City Builders.”

I think this blurb has some good moments (the last sentence kind of works), but frankly overall it’s pedestrian. Where’s the good reason why a reader might be interested in the book?

All right then, I’ve had a go at another iteration:

“Light years from home, Starship Raven went down in an plunging blazing wreck. Crack investigator Angelie Gunnarson and her team love this kind of impossible mystery. But the Raven might have more secrets than even Angelie can handle. An action-packed short sci-fi novel from the award-winning author of The City Builders.”

Hmm. Not quite sure yet. Don’t quite know what the next iteration will be.

I am, however, going to take a course in Writing Sales Copy, to see if I can’t get a better handle on this.

Then of course there’s work to do on the covers… and all the time work to do on the craft of writing too…

All this is pretty fun.